Private Decision-Pattern Assessment
How coherent are your decisions under pressure?
Complete three guided stages to reveal your primary decision pattern, supporting pattern, strongest advantage, main pressure risk, and recommended next step.
What does this assessment measure?
It evaluates how your choices organize sequence, evidence, action, stability, correction, and contradiction under pressure.
What will my result include?
Your result includes a practical Coherence Index or pattern-only read, a primary pattern, a support pattern, strengths, risks, calibration, processing signals, and one recommended next step.
Is the assessment private?
This version runs locally in your browser. It does not require an account, email your answers, call an API, or store the result.
This is a self-reflection and decision-pattern instrument. It is not a medical, mental-health, legal, employment, intelligence, or official personality-type diagnostic.
Instrument Authority
Technical construction and interpretation
Open only the sections you want to inspect. The assessment remains one shared instance, and switching faces does not reset answers or alter scoring.
Assessment structure
The instrument contains two intake anchors followed by ten randomized real-world scenarios.
- Question 1: self-rated coherence.
- Question 2: claimed primary and support patterns.
- Questions 3–12: pressure scenarios.
Response weighting
The first move is weighted ×2. The support move is weighted ×1. Both contribute to archetype, coherence, subscale, and pressure-break calculations.
Coherence subscales
- Sequence Integrity
- Evidence Discipline
- Action Realism
- Field Stability
- Correction Capacity
- Contradiction Resistance
Calibration and claim alignment
Calibration compares the participant's self-rating against the revealed scenario score. Claim alignment compares the selected archetype blend against the revealed blend.
Pressure-break logic
Certain answers represent avoidance, unsupported certainty, comfort over accountability, blame displacement, motion without proof, or collapse under pressure.
These are treated as decision signals rather than personal identities.
Experimental outputs and boundaries
The technical result can generate an experimental projected IQ-style processing range and a possible MBTI-style preference hypothesis.
Neither output is an IQ test, certified intelligence score, official MBTI result, clinical diagnosis, or employment determination.
- 1 Self-Rating Rate your current coherence.
- 2 Patterns Choose primary and support.
- 3 Scenarios Respond under pressure.